MEDIA COVERAGE OF MARCH FOR LIFE WAS MISSING SOMETHING

The 2013 March for Life in Washington DC marked 40 years of abortion on demand in the United States: It broke all previous attendance records with an estimated 500,000 people. Did you notice something about the meagre media coverage of the event? The absence of the word "life". As usual the liberal media are trying to couch the debate to show abortion supporter in a positive light. Liberal abortion advocates do not like the term "pro-life" because it implies they are pro-death. Yes, that pretty much sums it up -- if the shoe fits.  Let me strip away all the flowery or deceptive language and put the issue in raw blunt words.

Pro-choicers support the choice to kill unwanted or inconvenient unborn children to solve what amounts to social problems of their parents. Am I wrong?

For more information on the media censoring of the word life from coverage of the 2013 March for Life in Washington D.C. go to http://www.lifenews.com/2013/01/25/networks-censor-word-life-from-march-for-life-coverage/ , "Networks Censor Word from March for Life Coverage."

MDP