![]() |
The "honourable" John Turner ushered Canada's 1969 abortion law |
“The bill has rejected the eugenic, sociological or
criminal offence reasons. The bill limits the possibility of therapeutic
abortion to these circumstances: It is to be performed by a medical
practitioner who is supported by a therapeutic abortion committee of medical
practitioners in a certified or approved hospital, and the abortion is to be
performed only where the health or life of the mother is in danger.”[1]
It was an evil ruse: Once the bill became law it did not limit
abortion to certain circumstances, it
allowed abortions in any circumstance.
There were people who warned this would happen. One written brief submitted to
Canada’s Parliament back in 1967 warned that abortion acceptance would make
Canada step backward in time:
We would enter a second Dark Age where human life
counted for little…When we find ourselves killing off our unwanted babies, why
not our old people, our crippled, our blind and our sick? Why not all inmates
of prisons and mental institutions? …
All abortion, in fact, is human sacrifice. If not to
appease our anger, it is the sacrifice of an innocent life to our own comfort
and convenience, our social and economic position or perhaps a woman’s peace of
mind or physical well-being… To legalize abortion is to give official sanction
to it and therefore encourage it not only in some circumstances, but whenever
someone thinks it convenient.[2]
In the year that Canada’s abortion bill passed into law (1969) there
were 268 abortions in the entire country. The ink was barely dry on the
legislation legalizing abortion and the law was being flouted. Within twelve
months, the number of Canadian abortions spiked over 4,000 percent to 11,152!
In 1972, the official number of abortions in Canada jumped further to 37,299.[3] The tight narrow guidelines were rarely if ever met. The number of abortions in Canada
increased dramatically and unrelentingly. (By 1982, things got so bad in Canada
that abortions outnumbered live births in Canada’s largest city of Toronto![4])
I had a discussion with a retired Canadian physician whose medical
practice was its peak during the 1960s and1970s. He could not remember any
request for abortion ever being refused by a hospital abortion committee. He
recalled that in his experience, all requests for abortions were simply
rubber-stamped.
No abortion law
tolerated

America
follows suit
By the time of America’s infamous 1973 Roe verses Wade abortion
decision by the United States Supreme Court, Canada had had its abortion legislation
for nearly three and a half years. By that time, its rate of abortion increased
over 13,000 percent! All America had to do was look north to Canada, with a
fraction its population, for an indication of what lay in store for the US.
But sadly the human carnage that was occurring north of the 49th parallel was exactly what American “progressive” secularists had been conniving to get for years: unrestricted abortion. They knew that permissiveness toward abortion would result in wild increases in abortion rates, and that's what happened.
But sadly the human carnage that was occurring north of the 49th parallel was exactly what American “progressive” secularists had been conniving to get for years: unrestricted abortion. They knew that permissiveness toward abortion would result in wild increases in abortion rates, and that's what happened.

More than 57 million abortions have occurred in America since
Roe v Wade in 1973.
According to Paul Belien of The
Brussels Journal there are 40 million abortions performed in the world each
year.[6] The Canadian kooks who spoke against
abortion, forty years ago, were right.
“We would enter a second Dark Age where
human life counted for little…When we find ourselves killing off our unwanted
babies, why not our old people, our crippled, …”
[2] Taken from, Alponse de Valk, Morality
and Law in Canadian Politics: The Abortion Controversy (Montreal . P.Q., Canada : Palm Publishing, 1974), p. 51. Out of
print. See House of Commons Committee
Proceeding minutes -- Abortion, November 8, 1967, Appendix “F,” pp.168ff..
[3] Government of Canada .
Statistics Canada , Therapeutic
Abortions, 1981, Minister of Supply and Services 1983, Catalogue 82-211,
P.120.
[4]“Abortions outnumber live births in Toronto ,” Toronto
Globe and Mail, June 17th,
1983.
[5] In the mid-1979s, Dr. Nathanson renounced his abortion activities
and advocacy. He became vehemently opposed to abortion and pro-Life advocate,
and later became a Christian.
[6] Paul Belien, “EU to Catholic Doctors: Thou Shalt Abort,” The Brussels
Journal, 27 December 2005.
If these advocates ever believed that their "guidelines" would actually stick, they can't anymore. Guidelines are a pretense to satisfy the public that there has been sufficient hand-wringing. Nothing more.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteBoth these men are great champions for life. It grieves me to see pro-Life people attack pro-Life people.
ReplyDelete