“Our once great western Christian civilization is dying. If this matters to followers of Jesus Christ, then we must set aside our denominational differences and work together to strengthen the things that remain and reclaim what has been lost. Evangelicals and Catholics must stand together to re-establish that former Christian culture and moral consensus. We have the numbers and the organization but the question is this: Do we have the will to win this present spiritual battle for Jesus Christ against secularism? Will we prayerfully and cooperatively work toward a new Christian spiritual revival ― or will we choose to hunker down in our churches and denominationalisms and watch everything sink into the spiritual and moral abyss of a New Dark Age?” - Mark Davis Pickup

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Canada and late term abortions


Abortion ideologues are busy building a myth that there are no late term abortions in Canada. This is blatantly false. They are like other holocaust deniers. In the long and putrid history of abortion on demand in Canada, late term abortions have been part of the equation.

Perhaps you may remember the fiasco that the Calgary Foothills Hospital was caught in during the late 1990s. They were involved in late term abortions of disabled children. They vehemently denied it but unfortunately a nurse who was there spilled the beans. I was later informewd that the hospital simply changed their approach and began fatally injecting children in utero, who were suspected of having disabilities: Voila! Still born not abortion.

Dr. Margaret Somerville, Director of McGill University Centre for Medicine,Ethics and Law, responded to the claim that there are no late term abortions in Canada. She said there were --

"...several late term abortion cases on which I have been consulted by people - some of them healthcare professionals - involved in the decision making about abortion, who were extremely distressed about the situation they were facing.

The case in question involved a married couple - man and woman - who had conceived naturally, the woman was 34 weeks pregnant and the scan showed the baby had a cleft palate. They requested an abortion, because they did not want to have a "defective baby".

In another case, a 29 year old graduate student from [OMITTED] was 32 weeks pregnant and wanted an abortion for social reasons. I was consulted on the case and later followed up to see what happened. The answer I received was that "You don't want to know", said in such a way it was clear an abortion had been undertaken.

I've also been consulted on late term selective reduction of multiple pregnancy in which one or more fetuses are killed in utero with a lethal injection of potassium chloride into their heart and the dead fetus(es) delivered at term with the living one(s). In two cases I know of involving twins, one twin was killed. In fact, I wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine on an early case in which this was done because the woman did not want to have twins and said she would abort both babies unless one was killed.

There is an abortion clinic on Saint Catherine Street in Montreal that, as I understand the situation, does all the very late term (over 22 weeks gestation) abortions in Quebec. It's been reported that the Quebec Government has sent at least one obstetrician to the US to be trained to do these abortions - if they were not happening, why have a clinic and why train someone to do them? And I also understand that late abortions up to 22 weeks (i.e. past the CMA's cut-off for viability of 20 weeks) are usually done at a University of Sherbrooke hospital in Sherbrooke.

I do not have information on other provinces, but I'd be surprised if the situation I describe above is unique to Quebec. There's a truism in ethics, but no less important for that, that good facts are essential to good ethics. We all need to know these facts. The reason we do not, is that some years ago, instructions were given to Statistics Canada not to request from hospitals and clinics reporting, as required, on the number of abortions, the gestational age at which abortion occurred. My understanding is that this was a politically motivated instruction."


There you have it.

Do not believe the rantings of abortion advocates. They will say whatever it takes to defend their sacred cow of abortion on demand.

Mark Pickup

Friday, May 30, 2008

In search of meaning and being


Read Mark Pickup's blog for 30 June "In search of meaning and being" at http://markpickup.blogspot.com

Sunday, May 25, 2008

The Great Sin


To read Mark Pickup's blog for 25 May 2008 "The Great Sin", go to http://markpickup.blogspot.com

Monday, May 19, 2008

The happy past cannot be restored


To read Mark Pickup's latest blog for 19 May 2008: "The happy past cannot repeat" go to http://markpickup.blogspot.com

Thursday, May 15, 2008

America's urgent moral conundrum about abortion


John McCain’s attack on George Bush abortion position. Go to
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4823197&affil=wls

Jill Stanek sent me her blog column revealing a surly John McCain attacking George Bush during the Republican nomination process for the 2000 Presidential election. His attack against Bush was for supporting the Republican abortion position. Senator McCain challenged the pro-Life position that would not make exceptions for rape, incest or risk to the mother’s health.

What is revealed was that John McCain is not really pro-Life. Granted that attack on George Bush was eight years ago, but it revealed his soft commitment (if at all) to ending abortion in America.

In my country of Canada, the number of abortions for reasons of rape, incest or risk to the mother’s life or health added together amounts to less than 5% of all abortions. Unless America has much more per-capita incest than Canada, more rapists, or unless America’s women are much unhealthier than their Canadian counterparts, or American doctors competency is much less than their Canadian counterparts -- John McCain illustrated that he would let the rare exceptions govern his approach to abortion as a whole. His rape, incest and risk to the mother’s life were the reddest of herrings, and he should have known that. In America, less than 1% of abortions are for rape and incest. (See http://www.voteyesforlife.com/petition.html)

Abortion is not an answer to rape. It is a strange form of justice that would make a child pay for the crime of its father. Abortion does not take away the violence or violation against the woman: it makes her a party to violence by killing the child. The woman becomes a transgressor too. And in the end, her aggressive action can not relieve the pain of the first act of aggression.

The same is true of incest. Abortion will not take away the evil – it only perpetuates more evil!

As for risk to the mother’s life, I recently had a discussion with an obstetrician-gynecologist and associate professor of obstetrics at a major Canadian university. He said in the rare case of a high risk pregnancy, he would simply take the pregnancy far enough along to give the baby a good chance at survival then stop the pregnancy – saving both mother and baby.

[Incidentally, he also said that he can not think of any medical scenario justifying partial birth abortion.]

No, John McCain and his rape, incest and risk to the mother’s life was a red herring that simply proved he is soft on abortion and not committed to the Republican pro-Life stance.

America faces a conundrum for the next presidential election. The choices will be between a Democrat who is radically pro-abortion or a Republican who’s not really really pro-Life.

Rampant abortion in America has gone on far too long. The blood of more than 40-million preborn children pollutes American soil (and Canadian soil) and cries to God for justice. This can not continue! God is patient but He has his limits. America must stop the wickedness of abortion, overturn Roe v. Wade, or risk God’s judgment. Neither the Democrats nor Republicans in the White House will do that.

My country of Canada faces a similar dilemma.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Keeping the assisted suicide debate live in Canada


Read Mark Pickup's blog for 1 May 2008 "Another attempt to legalize assisted suicide in Canada". Go to http://markpickup.blogspot.com