"I am pro-life and anti-euthanasia but I don't agree with you about Latimer. There are always exceptions. My experience with the medical system has shown me that there are times, rare but they do happen, when a situation really is dire. I have never seen any evidence that Latimer seethed with resentment of his daughter. She was in pain and was going to be in more and more pain and she couldn't take pain meds because of the anti-convulsants she was on. How long is a parent supposed to live with that? They could have put Tracey in a home and left her there but in homes she didn't thrive, so they could have chosen slow death for her and looked away. And that would have been morally alright? Latimer is an inarticulate, not-Godless Saskatchewan farmer who doesn't expect or ask a nanny state to solve his problems for him. I just can't see what he did as evil. I can see killing a child in pain who faces more and more pain out of love."
"I don't see discussing this as being wrong either. We need to discern the difference between someone in a situation where there is no answer and the other woman who simply doesn't want her children to live as they are -not in pain."
"Having said that, I do agree that this is not a good time to be disabled. Surely it doesn't do the disabled any service to cover over the really hard questions?"
UNDERCURRENT OF PREJUDICE
You may have not seen evidence that Robert Latimer seethed with resentment for his daughter but, as the title of the previous blog states, there is seething undercurrent of public and media resentment and prejudice in Canada toward the disabled. It's often disguised in false yet noble sounding phrases such as "freedom of choice in dying" "death with dignity"and "mercy killing", but the effect is always the same: Get rid of the sick and disabled.
It's interesting to note that in October 2011, Canada's Parliament gave all Party support to developing a National Suicide Prevention Strategy yet there were MPs who supported it who also support assisted suicide for the disabled. So let me get this straight: The healthy and able-bodied population deserve suicide prevention but the disabled deserve help to commit suicide. What other conclusion should a Canadian with a severe disability (like me) draw from this?!
TESTIMONY UNDER OATH
Back to the Latimer case. I am going to make some comments based on the court transcripts of the second trial, not articles in the popular press. (Remember the testimony given was under oath by various witnesses close to the case.) Anonymous says Tracy was in pain and the pain would only increase because of the anti-seizure medication she was on conflicted with possible pain medications. Tracy was only given Tylenol. Firstly, let us establish that according to testimony of a Theresa Huyghebaert, group home manager in North Battleford, Saskatchewan, Tracy did not have grand mal seizures rather only short milder petit mals. The prospect of pain management was not properly explored by Robert Latimer when the last surgery was planned on October of 1993. According to his confession, he started thinking about killing Tracy right after the doctor appointment. (Incidentally, only after toxicology tests revealed lethal levels of carbon monoxide in Tracy's system (from Latimer's truck) were the police finally able to pry a confession of murder from Robert Latimer. Tracy did not die in her sleep as he initially maintained.)
The idea that the sum total of Tracy Latimer's life was misery and pain was inaccurate. Even though Robert Latimer's wife (Laura) tried to portray Tracey's life that way to protect her husband and support the defence strategy to fixate on Tracy's disability and pain, the Prosecution was able to get her to grudgingly admit that Tracy had good times.
Was Tracy's life completely miserable as the media and Robert's defence lawyers maintained? Was Tracy's life unworthy of living? Was her life one of continual suffering? Did Tracy have no happiness, no joy? Did her life have no redeeming qualities as the defence lawyer, media and Laura Latimer portrayed?
Laura told court that Tracy's last surgery left her utterly miserable. She said: "Tracy was in a lot of pain. Tracy was miserable. She used to be a happy little girl, and she turned into someone who just sat slumped, just waited to be moved. She was -- she was very unhappy." The image of Tracy painted at the trial, and reported by the media, was untrue and this was revealed numerous times during the court proceedings.
Misery and pain were not the sum total of Tracy Latimer's life any more than pain and misery are the sum total in the lives of countless other people with severe disabilities.
TRACY WAS HAPPY
Tracy was a happy child. Professionals who worked with Tracy contradicted Laura's dismal portrayal of Tracy. Even Laura contradicted herself through her handwritten notes in a communication book that always accompanied Tracy for caregivers to read. Samples of Laura's notes alluding to Tracy being a happy child included comments like "Tracy was happy", "Tracy ate a good ham supper, she was a very happy girl", "When I came home, I gave Tracy a pudding. She was a happy girl.", "Tracy seems cheerful and more like her old self.", and "Tracy was very cheerful".
Tracy enjoyed sleep-overs and had a kean sense of mischief and fun. Her mother wrote in Tracy's book: "Tracy was the worst little girl at the sleep-over, up at ten to seven, laughing and vocalizing."
In another place Laura wrote: "After supper, we had a bonfire and Tracy sat outside until about nine o'clock. It was a beautiful night. Tracy seemed alert and happy." Laura continued, "Tracy had a good weekend, sat out on the deck lots. Grandma and grandpa came yesterday, she was so happy to see grandma."
Tracy Latimer went to a developmental centre Monday to Friday for regular school days. She came home each day on the same school bus as her siblings and other children, and did so right up to the Friday before she was murdered by her father. There were discussions about integrating Tracy into the regular school system. All of this information was brought out at the trial was available to read in the court transcripts if anybody cared to research it.
Apparently Anonymous has not done such research or she would not put forth the assertion that Tracy's parents could have put her in an institution ... at least I hope she would not. Even so, an institution is far better than a grave.
Robert Latimer did not behave like a good father. A good father does not murder his child. If he did the right thing -- as he still maintains -- why did he lie to police and attempt to destroy evidence? Why did he maintain Tracy died in her sleep (until evidence showed otherwise) rather than admit right away that he put Tracy in his truck and piped exhaust fumes into the cab? Own up to it and take the consequences -- if, in fact he did the right thing. The fact remains it was not the right thing. If Robert Latimer murdered one of his healthy children he would have been condemned in the eyes of the Canadian public. But he murdered his disabled child and became a folk-hero.
ROBERT LATIMER/SUSAN SMITH
I don't think so. That's a reason I said Canada has a seething prejudice against the disabled -- and that prejudice extends to children. God forgive us.
This is very good. Thank you!
Thank you, Mr. Pickup. My severely disabled daughter Veronica would thank you if she could speak. She is the light of our lives. She is 25 and functions on a nine-month-old level due to profound MR, legal blindness, and a seizure disorder. In my opinion, she is more fully human than someone who would support killing a child. God help us all.
Thank you for addressing this issue. Now days it seems that there are so many people do not value life. Sure, they value their own life, but not that of others (including their own children). Since when are we able to determine that one life is less valuable than another? When did we become God to choose who lives and who dies? This world is really becoming more and more chaotic and hearts are becoming hard. Thank you again for addressing euthanasia and reiterating that life is more precious than this.
Very well said,well thought out. Thank you.
Thank you MDP!!! I stumbled upon this blog and am impressed. The truth that is set forth here will conquer. I have worked with disabled people for years and will be the first to tell you they teach us lessons and humble us. If our society attempts to remove them, they are treading on dangerous ground.
I find your viewpoints to be disgusting and dangerous. In response to Carole Van Amburg, you have no idea if your daughter would thank you or not, with all due respect. Secondly, do not ever bring Jesus Christ or God into the equation when you are dealing with the public. You have absolutely no right to push that complete bullshit on people who may or may not believe. Euthanasia is legal in several nations, and will be legal in Canada soon enough. She wasn't killed because her life was devalued, or because she wasn't respected. It takes a real man to give the ultimate gift of death to a daughter that is, essentially, being tortured on a daily basis by life. Death happens to every single one of us, what makes you people so afraid of it? This really pisses me off, to no extent. Do you understand that the sanctity of life includes quality of life?
Do you people understand how truly selfish it is to continue a life that is nothing but pain? Just for the sake of being alive? His Majesty King George VI was euthanized by his Doctor, because his lung cancer was terminal. It was done without his consent. Why? He couldn't fucking consent. You people praise this man just because he's disabled and thinks that his struggle is the same as everybody else's. You sir are incapable of surrendering your own emotions to understand somebody else's pain, and as I said, are dangerous and ridiculous. Robert Latimer should not have spent a day in prison, period. Just like Henry Morgentaler shouldn't have even been charged. I bet you people hate him too, or any progression for that matter. Guess what, he's a member of the Order of Canada for a reason. Real courage isn't being afraid to conform to fucking idiots that mention God or a Bible in public. The second you bring up some bullshit Bronze Age garbage, to a learned debate, you are a moron. I swear Loki put you people on this planet to specifically challenge what it means to be sane. You also need to consult Odin, because you too should give an eye up for knowledge. Oh, I'm sorry, am I sounding crazy to you? Don't like hearing about the Old Gods? Don't believe in them? My point exactly.
Post a Comment