Canada's Supreme Court is considering the matter of assisted suicide. Will they strike down the nation's laws against it, just like they struck down Canada's law on abortion in 1988? I fear they may but pray they will not. On October 16th 2014 I wrote an urgent letter to the Canadian Supreme Court Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin pleading with the high court not to strike down Canada's laws pertaining to assisted suicide. Below is the text of that letter.
____________________
Dear Chief Justice McLachlin:
Canada’s Supreme
Court is considering the case of Kay Carter and physician assisted suicide. As
a Canadian who has been incurably ill and disabled for more than 30 years with
degenerative multiple sclerosis (MS), I
implore the Supreme Court not to strike down Canada’s laws prohibiting assisted
suicide. The laws are there to protect vulnerable people when they are at
their lowest point of life and overwhelmed by their circumstances. Let me
illustrate:
I was diagnosed
with MS in 1984. At about
the 2-3 year point in my downhill slide with MS, my grief was so profound and
unimaginable, my sorrow so deep, my heartache so sharp, that my judgment was
clouded (although I did not know that at the time). If assisted suicide had
been available in the mid-1980s, and if I had not been surrounded by people who held
up my value even when I doubted it, I may have taken my life at a low point. I
am so glad now that did not happen. I needed to safely grieve and not be helped
with a death wish I might have expressed at my lowest point. Back then, I could
not see past my darkness. I had no idea that the future would eventually grace
my life with five beautiful grandchildren to love and new avenues for joy and
new reasons to live despite my chronic, incurable, degenerate disease and
serious disability.
You will hear much
about unbearable pain and suffering. Such arguments are suitable to the 1970s not
the 21st Century. Pain management has become so advanced it can
eliminate all physical pain. Ottawa’s Dr. John Scott is a world renowned
palliative care and pain management specialist. He wrote:
“The World Health Organization has
demonstrated that access to pain-relieving drugs, along with a simple education
program, can achieve relief in the vast majority of patients. Specialists in
various parts of the world estimate that these basic approaches can control
85-98 percent of cases. The remaining cases require more careful attention and
the use of multiple drugs and therapies to achieve complete relief.” [Emphasis
mine.]
Those words were
written back in 1995. How much more has the wonderful science of pain relief
progressed in these intervening 19 years?! If someone is suffering great pain
in 2014, they do not need suicide, they need a new doctor! For a civilized
society, the answer to suffering is never to kill the sufferer rather to
protect and care for them within state-of-the-art palliation which does not,
and must not, include suicide or euthanasia.
AUTONOMY VERSUS COMMUNITY
I want to
conclude with this thought: Many people hold up personal autonomy and
independence as the highest right. But if you value community they are not the
highest right. The idea of independent personal autonomy is diametrically
opposed to the concept of interdependent community. One person’s actions don’t affect just them.
They never do. If I choose assisted suicide it will affect my wife, my children
and my grandchildren. It will affect my doctor because I will ask her to stop
being a healer and become my killer. My suicide will affect my community and,
in a small way, it will affect my nation by helping to entrench the notion
there is such a thing as a life unworthy to be lived.
No
Madam Chief Justice, no one has a right to assisted suicide and that includes
the incurably ill and disabled, like me. It will not just affect me – it will
help to put in peril vulnerable people who will come after me. No matter how
sick I become I still have a responsibility to the Common Good of society and
posterity. I have a right to expect the best palliative care available and
those things that foster life with dignity, even at its end.
Believe me,
dear Chief Justice,
Yours sincerely.
Mark Davis Pickup
2 comments:
Well said! Thanks for soldiering on with this issue.
Thank you Catherine. All Human life matters because it is sacred. We must never be silent about the extermination of human life or assaults on the natural human dignity of every human life. There was a time, not so very long ago, when western society believed this. I still do.
Post a Comment