Read Mark Pickup's latest blog "A Spark of God's love" at http://markpickup.org

HLM

Is Barack Hussein Obama qualified to be President?

Read Mark Pickup's blog about this at http://markpickup.org

HLM

Mark and LaRee Pickup available to speak

The life experiences of LaRee and Mark Pickup have followed closely with the major Life issues of our time. As teenage lovers they found themselves confronted with an unplanned and unwanted pregnancy. They chose abortion for their baby. LaRee and Mark grieved that abortion for decades.

In 1984, Mark was diagnosed with degenerative multiple sclerosis.
Their journey through physical degeneration and serious disability has been the cause of profound trials and grief. Mark is triplegic (only his left arm is fully functional) and he is confined to an electric wheelchair. Other people in similar situations have opted for assisted suicide. LaRee and Mark have also dealt with end-of-life issues of parents, as well as diseases and care of extremely aged family members.

They have become committed to the cause of life and defence of the vulnerable. For more than a decade Mark has spoken across Canada and the United States promoting the sanctity, dignity and equality of all human life. He has addressed politicians and legislative committees (both Canadian and American), university forums, hospital medical staffs, religious and denominational leaders, community groups and organizations about the critical importance of protecting all human life from conception to natural death. Mark is also a widely published writer on bioethical and Christian issues.

LaRee is the provincial Director of the Alberta Pro-Life

Association (Canada). She is responsible for educational development and coordination of political presence for Life issues throughout the Canadian province of Alberta.

LaRee and Mark Pickup have developed a gripping presentation about their personal experiences spanning the full spectrum of Life issues. They are available to speak to your organization, group, or church. LaRee and Mark can also speak about their Christian perspective of suffering, grief and loss.

Contact LaRee and Mark Pickup at (780) 929-9230 or by email: MPickup@shaw.ca, to speak to your group, organization or church.

Mark Pickup is incurably ill with a disease some people say might be cured by embryonic stem cell therapies. Read why he could not accept it at http://MarkPickup.org

If Canada really is "pro-choice", then balance the Choice

Abortion denies life.


My wife, LaRee (photo left), had an abortion at seventeen. She was not given information about the procedure and left ignorant about its after-effects -- the regrets and guilt that lasted for years. Today, LaRee is the provincial Director of Alberta Pro-Life Association (Canada). She is convinced that no abortion should be performed without providing women with full disclosure about the procedure, information about prenatal life, and the risks associated with abortion. There are very real and serious risks.

Abortion is a sign that society
has failed women. No woman should have to choose between the life of her child and her education or career. A society that is truly concerned about her needs should ensure both options are available to her.

BALANCE THE CHOICE

Provinces provide millions of tax dollars to pay for abortions on demand.

If Canadians really are “pro-choice”, why is only one
choice so heavily funded? I propose a balanced approach. Provide equal funding for women who choose life for their babies. Provide funding to homes for unwed mothers where they can finish their education and receive prenatal care and life skills training.
Provide funding for community and faith based partnerships with government for shepherding homes where women in crisis pregnancies can establish or re-establish community connections and mentoring. Give women positive choices not just negative choices.

The fact is this: Canada not a pro-choice society. We are pro-abortion. If Canada was in favour of choice we would ensure the choice was evenly weighed for women. But we don’t do that. We only support the abortion choice.

Canadian society can not legitimately claim to be pro-choice. It favours abortion and says so with its funding.

Mark Pickup

We can only wonder

NBC television rejected a pro-Life ad to be aired during the Superbowl. Mark Pickup weighs in on the decision with his latest blog "We can only wonder". Read his comments at http://markpickup.blogspot.com

Disability and Health care

Last month in London, England, a disabled man phoned for an ambulance because he was having a heart attack. Barry Baker, 59, then collapsed and lost consciousness.

The telephone fell to the floor too but the line remained open and the operator was still listening when paramedics arrived. They talked about whether Baker was worth saving and came to the conclusion he didn’t make the grade.

CONDEMNED TO DEATH

They did not resuscitate Baker and decided to tell their supervisors he was dead when they arrived. The operator listening on the telephone was horrified at what she heard and reported the incident to police. Emergency calls in London are recorded so the conversation of the paramedics was on tape. Police brought criminal charges against the paramedics.

Last August, a Scottish paramedic allegedly ignored the calls of a disabled woman who was having a suspected heart attack. Apparently he was on his tea break and a tasty sandwich took priority over the woman’s call for help. The woman died, the sandwich digested and the paramedic went on to “serve” the public the next day.

These cases are disturbing.

Please understand that I am not attacking paramedics. I have the highest regard for their profession. The vast majority of paramedics are wonderful, so excellent at serving people in medical need that when a bad apple shows up, the public is deeply offended that the trust they have for paramedics has been tarnished.

ANTI-DISABILITY BIAS

My point in highlighting these cases in England and Scotland is to illustrate an anti-disability bias amongst health care professionals.

In my case, the culprit was not ambulance attendants or paramedics; it was an attending physician at a hospital.

One night a few years ago, I experienced a bizarre attack with my
multiple sclerosis that mimicked a stroke. This frightening episode occurred suddenly then ended a few hours later almost as quickly as it came. But those few hours were terrifying.

At the height of the attack, I appeared to be unconscious, but was fully aware of my surroundings. It was a strange experience. If nursing staff at the hospital asked me a question I could respond, but only with one or two word answers.

When the emergency physician came in the room he looked at the chart then threw it on the counter and barked, “This is MS! I can’t do anything for this man.”

He muttered a few more disparaging comments and finally the nurse warned him I could hear what was being said.

Silence.

The doctor whispered a few things to the nurse (inaudible to me) then ordered some medication and tests, and left.

I wonder what else he would have said if the nurse had not spilled the beans?

Would things have been different with attitudes of health care professionals if I or the other disabled patients I mentioned were able-bodied? I don’t know, but I do know that prejudice against people with disabilities is real. It extends throughout various aspects of society but is most glaring in medicine. When it comes to medical care, anti-disability prejudice can be deadly.

TRUST IS BROKEN

Word gets around and disabled people talk. We can become suspicious about whether we will be denied treatment or health care equal to that given to the rest of the population, if we are in a medical crisis.


What if we cannot speak up for ourselves at a critical moment of medical decision-making, and our loved ones are absent to advocate for our lives? Will anti-disability prejudice that is increasingly prevalent in health care delivery and bioethical circles, result in us being denied treatment or care?

It’s scary to be disabled in an era of post-Hippocratic medicine. A
utilitarian model has supplanted the sanctity of human life ethic. Futile care theories or cost-benefit decisions can prevail in critical or long-term care situations.


Because of this new reality, I’ve become suspicious of secular hospitals. If I must be hospitalized, I want it to be in a Catholic hospital or nursing home where care is governed by Christian moral consensus that is in keeping with Catholic teaching.

CATHOLIC CARE
Catholic teaching condemns euthanasia as morally unacceptable

(Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 2277). The criteria for withdrawal of treatment and pain relief are clearly defined (nos. 2278–2279).

The natural human dignity and respect of the sick, handicapped or the disabled is not only promoted but required in Catholic institutions.

In such matters, I have noticed an unmistakable difference between Catholic and secular hospitals. Are there ever occasions when Catholic hospitals have not behaved in a Catholic manner? Yes, but I trust they are rare.


As a general rule there is a Christian ethos or ethic that permeates Catholic hospitals and institutions. It is reflected in medical treatment and care that brings honour not shame to the Church and the name of Jesus Christ.

People with serious disabilities are safer in Catholic hospitals. Never let that change.

Mark Pickup

(This article also appeared in Canada's Western Catholic Reporter newspaper for the week of 26 January 2009, under the title "Medical Staff Pronounced Death Sentences on the Disabled" (http://www.wcr.ab.ca/columns/markpickup/2009/markpickup012609.shtml))