This blog deals with
Christian living, disability, ethics,
Life Issues, a wonderful miracle,
and faith in Jesus Christ.
“Our once great western Christian civilization is dying. If this matters to followers of Jesus Christ, then we must set aside our denominational differences and work together to strengthen the things that remain and reclaim what has been lost. Evangelicals and Catholics must stand together to re-establish that former Christian culture and moral consensus. We have the numbers and the organization but the question is this: Do we have the will to win this present spiritual battle for Jesus Christ against secularism? Will we prayerfully and cooperatively work toward a new Christian spiritual revival ― or will we choose to hunker down in our churches and denominationalisms and watch everything sink into the spiritual and moral abyss of a New Dark Age?” - Mark Davis Pickup
Saturday, September 5, 2015
GOD MUST HAVE KNOWN! HE DID. THAT'S THE HIGH STAKES RISK OF LOVE
My blog post for 18 August 2015 was entitled "Consequences of Original Sin". I received an email from a reader. Let me refer to her as J. In her email J wrote: "I just read your blog Consequences of Original Sin, and although I have
heard the same story many times and have discussed it with many people, I still
have a nagging question about `The original plan`not including death. If God
is ALL KNOWING, then he must have known how the whole story would unfold before
ever creating mankind. I struggle with this thought over Lucifer falling from
Heaven as well. People try to convince me that it is about free will...that`s
not what I am stuck on. GOD MUST HAVE KNOWN....that is my
point.... everything....He knew everything....Evil was no surprise to Him. Can
you clarify this irritating little glitch I have in my thinking for me?"
I gave J's question considerable thought before writing back. I am a layman, not a theologian. With trembling I responded:
Dear J. - It seems that your friends who have been speaking about
free will are right in
as far as it goes ... the problem is that I don’t think they took the point far
enough. The overarching motif in all of creation is divine love and its
corollary of holiness. I think your friends have things reversed. We are told in
the Scriptures that God is love and the Apostle John wrote extensively about
this. The Scriptures also tell us God is perfect, holy, and He desires that we
be holy too. It has been this way since the beginning. I have continually
misunderstood the depths of God’s love and the lengths He is prepared to go for
humanity to bring us toward Him and draw the human race to freely love Him back with as perfect a love as His. He has instilled a desire for perfect love in the human
heart. Bishop Fulton Sheen put it this way:
“...the human heart is isolated and in agony: it has more love to give than
any earth-bound object can receive – it clamors to be loved more lastingly and
comprehendingly than any human lover. But both the longings – to love perfectly,
to be loved perfectly – are mere vacuums in man; the most real part of his
nature turns out to be a void.” (Life Up Your Heart)
And so it is. In our current state we are incapable of receiving or giving
perfect love. Both require holiness. God has put a desire for eternity in our
hearts which we are not able to realize yet (Ecclesiastes 3.11) And I believe
this has traces of Eden. I think Sheen’s comment gives us an inkling of what people
miss when they talk about free will, and it is the desire to love perfectly and
be loved perfectly. But free will must have proper context. Real love must be
given freely. C.S. Lewis wrote in his monumental book Mere Christianity
(important in my own conversion): “A world of automata – of creatures that worked
like machines – would hardly be worth creating.” It would be contrary to God’s
nature of desiring to give perfect love and receive perfect love. Perfect love
can not be demanded; it must be freely given. That is where free will comes
in.
But as soon has there is a choice to love, there is also a choice to reject
love. This choice for divine love has cosmic proportions and that
involved/involves the Creator and the created. Yes, God knew the objects of His
love would reject Him and replace God-love with self-love, but that was/is the
risk and the point of love.
I think of it like this: A parent loves her child with all her heart. She
would freely lay down her life for her child. From infancy, the mother raises
her child to be a decent, loving and moral human being. Unfortunately, beginning at an early age the
mother notices the child has a stubborn and rebellious nature. Does the mother
stop trying to instill those values into the child? No, her love for her child
compels her to try to instill those things and to love. The mother has strong
suspicions her child will one day defy those values that mean the most to the
mother. As the child enters her teen years and early adulthood, the mother knows
in her heart the child will probably go astray but she still lets go. She must.
It’s part of the love package. The parent’s heart is broken to see her child go
off the rails, her love always desires her child to return. The porch light is
always on. Someone may ask, “Surely you knew your child would reject all you
stood for, and even you?” Yes the parent knew yet love drove her on. She always
desires that the child will love her as deeply as she loves her child.
Back to the consequences of Eden and Original Sin: The Apostle John tells
us Christ was with God in the beginning and that through Christ all things were
created. “In Him was life, and the light was the light of men.” (John 1:4) I
think it is within the perfect light of Christ that divine love and holiness
abide; spiritual enlightenment opens vistas of holiness. Outside of that light there is neither life nor authentic holiness. It was the decision, the choice to step out of the
Light, that humanity was plunged itself into spiritual darkness.
My Nelson Christian Dictionary defines holiness as “Moral or spiritual
perfection; sinlessness; entire sanctification. Quality of be set apart or
consecrated to God.” By choosing to try to be like God, man tried to become his
own god. By choosing something else than the source of life, humanity found
itself cut off from life and light (holiness). The natural consequences were
death. I use the improper adverb “were” because the consequences were far
reaching throughout history both in spiritual death and physical death. Once the
cup of innocence was spilled it could not be put back; rebellion had soaked into
human character; our spiritual DNA became adulterated. Something other than
the embrace of God’s divine love and holiness was chosen. The colossal
ramifications reverberated throughout the ages.
When I first became a Christian I wondered why God would put the “Tree of
the knowledge of good and evil” within humanity’s grasp? (Genesis 2.17 It was a
necessary ingredient of love. The divine motivation of love was illustrated in
the next verse. God said “it is not good for man to be alone.” and created
Eve to love: “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh”. The intimacy
of human love, at its best, only mirrored a pale reflection of God’s love.
God desires to be loved too! To willfully obey the divine Lover is part of loving and receiving perfect
love. His gift was perfect life and humanity chose something less and it
involved death because humanity was cut off from the source of life.
That is where choosing is so important: The desiring and the having.
Ultimately every person in every generation of a fallen race must
decide what they desire. The primordial spiritual battle is waged in every generation. We
face death in this life but life is freely offered in the next. The closer we
draw to Christ the more we discover love and holiness – those threads weave
throughout history. The choice is continually offered.
St. Paul told us, "Now
we know in part, but then we shall know just as we are known." The curse of death
that has plagued humanity since Eden will final be broken. The second Adam sets things right. Paul said,
“So also is the resurrection of the dead. The body is sown in corruption,
it is raised incorruptible. It is sown dishonorably; it is raised glorious. It
is sown weak; it is raised powerful. It is sown a natural body; it is raised a
spiritual body. there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual one. So too,
it is written, “The first man, Adam, became a living being,” the last Adam a
life-giving spirit. But the spiritual was not the first; rather the natural and
then the spiritual. ...Just as we have borne the image of the earthly one, we
shall also also bear the image of the heavenly one.” (1 Cor.15.42-46, 49.)
Yes, evil was no surprise to God but love and holiness were the intent.
Just as evil was no surprise, God made provision from the outset for the
world he loves to find the way back to Him, That provision was Christ. [Click on image below or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnyLWxFNOgI for Kari Jobe, "What Love Is This?" 4:12]
Beautiful response to a penetrating question. If J reads your response, then I invite J (as well as all other readers who read this blog) to tackle St. John Paul II's "The Christian Meaning of Human Suffering" (Salvivici Doloris, Feb 11, 1984). It is a thorough and elegant answer to the same question which ends at the same place --- the Cross of Jesus Christ. Only His suffering and death gives meaning to the freely chosen human history of suffering and death.
Please read it; it is awesome --- coming from the mind and heart of St. John Paul II the Great who was one of God's gifts to us as we journey in this "Valley of Tears).
And thank you once again, Mark, for your faithfulness, hope, and love. I will pray for you and please pray for us.
Dr. Reynolds - Thank you for this feedback. Pope John Paul II's Salvivi Doloris was written the year I was diagnosed with MS. It has been a great help to me throughout my disability journey. God bless.
2 comments:
Beautiful response to a penetrating question. If J reads your response, then I invite J (as well as all other readers who read this blog) to tackle St. John Paul II's "The Christian Meaning of Human Suffering" (Salvivici Doloris, Feb 11, 1984). It is a thorough and elegant answer to the same question which ends at the same place --- the Cross of Jesus Christ. Only His suffering and death gives meaning to the freely chosen human history of suffering and death.
Please read it; it is awesome --- coming from the mind and heart of St. John Paul II the Great who was one of God's gifts to us as we journey in this "Valley of Tears).
And thank you once again, Mark, for your faithfulness, hope, and love. I will pray for you and please pray for us.
Dr. Reynolds - Thank you for this feedback. Pope John Paul II's Salvivi Doloris was written the year I was diagnosed with MS. It has been a great help to me throughout my disability journey. God bless.
Post a Comment